The Influence of Learning Strategies, School Culture, Creativity Quotient, and Learning Motivation on Civics Learning Outcomes in Senior High School

Riza  Desriandi; Azwar  Ananda; Syafri  Anwar; Erianjoni; Maria  Montesori

doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/G7KJ9

Riza Desriandi SMA Negeri 2 Pangkalan Koto Baru, Limapuluh Kota Regency - Indonesia
Azwar Ananda Doctoral Program of Education Science - Postgraduate School, Universitas Negeri Padang
Syafri Anwar Doctoral Program of Education Science - Postgraduate School, Universitas Negeri Padang
Erianjoni Doctoral Program of Education Science - Postgraduate School, Universitas Negeri Padang
Maria Montesori Doctoral Program of Education Science - Postgraduate School, Universitas Negeri Padang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/G7KJ9

Keywords: Learning Strategies, School Culture, Creativity Quotient, Learning Motivation, Learning Outcomes

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to empirically determine the factors that influence Civics learning outcomes, including the Effect of Learning Strategies on Civics learning outcomes, the Effect of School Culture on Civics learning outcomes, the Effect of Creativity Quotient on Civics learning outcomes, the Effect of Learning Motivation on Outcomes Civics learning, Effect of Learning Strategies on Civics learning outcomes, Effect of School Culture on Civics learning motivation, Effect of Creativity Quotient on Civics learning motivation. the model of the mixed method path analysis research method uses a structural equation, namely the causality of the dimensions of the influence of learning strategies (X₁), school culture (X₂), creativity quotient (X₃), and learning motivation (X₄) on student learning outcomes variables (Y), and strategy causality learning (X₁), school culture (X₂), creativity quotient (X₃), to student learning outcomes variable (Y), through learning motivation (X₄). The research population was all high school students who took civics courses in the Limapuluh Kota Regency, West Sumatra - Indonesia. Meanwhile, the sampling in this study used the Proportionate Stratified Random Sampling technique. According to that, this technique is used when the population has members/elements that are not homogeneous and proportionally stratified. In this study, the proportion of population members is based on class XI which is more focused on learning without being disturbed by final exams and entering a new school. Based on the data collected, the total sample size is 100. The sample is taken based on proportional random sampling, namely the sample is taken randomly from each school from class XI Semester 2.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Admodiwirio S. (1994). Manajemen Pendidikan Indonesia, Jakarta: Ardadlzya Jaya.
2. Aly, H. N & Munzier S. (2003). Watak Pendidikan Islam, Jakarta: Friska Agung Insani.
3. Ankiewicz, P., van Rensburg, S., & Myburgh, C. (2001). Assessing the attitudinal technology profile of South African learners: A pilot study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11(2), 93-109.
4. Bafadal, I. (2009). Proses Perubahan di Sekolah: Studi Multisitus pada Tiga Sekolah Dasar yang Baik di Sumekar. Ilmu Pendidikan: Jurnal Kajian Teori Dan Praktik Kependidikan, 23(1).
5. Burhani, A. N., Muhammad, A., Sudarjat, E., Zada, K., & Hidayah, N. (2005). Factors Causing the Emergence of Radical Islam: Preliminary Analysis. ICIP Journal, 2(4), 1-23.
6. Hasbullah, H., & Haritman, E. (2006). Implikasi Penerapan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi dalam Pengembangan Pendidikan di Indonesia. In Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi (SNATI).
7. Huda, A. I. N., & Abduh, M. (2021). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(4), 1594-1601.
8. Isbandi, R. A. (1994). Pekerjaan dan ilmu kesejahteraan sosial; Dasar dasar pemikiran.
9. Iskandar, W. (2019). Analisis kebijakan pendidikan dalam perspektif madrasah. Al-Madrasah: Jurnal Pendidikan Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 4(1), 1-22.
10. Jamaluddin, J., Komarudin, A., & Rahman, A. A. (2019). Bimbingan orang tua dalam mengembangkan kepribadian anak. Atthulab: Islamic Religion Teaching and Learning Journal, 4(2), 170-184.
11. Kunandar. (2013). Penilaian Autentik (Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.
12. Mahfudz, S. (1990). Pengantar Psikologi Pendidikan. (Surabaya: PT. Bina Ilmu).
13. Putri, I. W. S., Trapsilasiwi, D., Hobri, H., Oktavianingtyas, E., Safrida, L. N., & Aini, N. (2019, April). Creative thinking skill with adversity quotient based on lesson study for learning community. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1211, No. 1, p. 012110). IOP Publishing.
14. Saengpanya, W., Upasen, R., & Kaewkohsaba, S. (2021). Creativity Quotient of Undergraduate Students in Higher Education Institutes within Thailand. Journal of Population and Social Studies [JPSS], 29, 311-324.
15. Sanjaya, W. (2011). Strategi Pemebelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media. cet ke-8.
16. Saphier, J., & King, M. (1985). Good seeds grow in strong cultures. Educational leadership, 42(6), 67-74.
17. Sardiman. A.M, (2007). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta : Raja. Grafindo Persada.
18. Sudjana, N. (2016). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
19. Zamroni. (2000). Paradigma Pendidikan Masa Depan. Yogyakarta : Bigraf Publishing