Main Article Content


This article will reveal the history of the emergence, essence, legal and economic aspects of the concept of privatization. This research paper analyzes the concept of privatization based on the comparative legal method. It is known that one of the effective ways to develop a market economy, increase private property in society, and reduce state intervention in the economy is the privatization of state assets. Privatization is not only the alienation of state property, but also the formation of new economic structures, the creation of an opportunity for economic companies to carry out entrepreneurial activities in sectors of the economy that were previously closed to them. Privatization makes it possible to solve the problems of monopolizing the economy, stimulating competition, replenishing state and local budgets.

The results of privatization, its success largely depend on how perfect the mechanism of legal regulation of relations between the division of state and municipal property into the property of individuals and legal entities. On the other hand, the concept of privatization is interpreted economically and legally.

In this regard, this article analyzes the concept of privatization, its economic, legal aspects. The article discusses various approaches of doctrinal and normative concepts to privatization. In this regard, it was concluded that the need for an expanded interpretation of the term privatization as a legal category, but taking into account the economic justification.


privatization state property assets private property legal entity individual state share

Article Details

How to Cite
ugli, I. D. B. (2023). Economic and Legal Nature of the Concept of Privatization. Central Asian Journal of Theoretical and Applied Science, 4(1), 80-84.


  1. 1. Parker, D. Privatization of State-Owned Enterprises. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Retrieved 27 Dec. 2022, from
  2. 2.
  3. 3. Bel, G. (2006), The Coining of “Privatization” and Germany’s National Socialist Party, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 3, 187–194.
  4. 4. Bel, G. (2006), The Coining of “Privatization” and Germany’s National Socialist Party, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 3, 187–194.
  5. 5. Шерли М., Ниллис Дж. Реформа и приватизация государственных предприятий: обобщение опыта / Мэри Шерли, Джон Ниллис. – Мировой банк. Институт экономического развития. – Тбилиси: Издво «КОКА», 1992. – с 129.
  6. 6. Диденко А. А. К вопросу о развитии отечественной концепции источников гражданского права // Власть закона. – 2012. – № 3. – С. 124-131.
  7. 7. Камышанский В.П. Приватизация предприятий. Право собственности/В.П. Камышанский. – М., 2009. – С - 192.
  8. 8. Игнатов В.М. Приватизация государственной собственности в РФ: проблемы правового регулирования: Автореф. дис. канд. юрид. наук / В.М.Игнатов. – М., 2002. – с 19.
  9. 9. Комарицкий С.И. Приватизация: правовые проблемы: Курс лекций / С.И.Комарицкий // Исследовательский центр частного права; Российская школа частного права. – М.: Статут, 2000. – C - 94.
  10. 10. Герцев Д.А. Гражданско-правовое регулирование отношений по приватизации предприятий, находящихся в государственной собственности: Дис. канд. юрид. наук. / Д.А.Герцев. – М., 2008. – C - 200.
  11. 11. Ўзбекистон Республикасининг хусусийлаштириш тўғрисида қонуни ID-53179