Development of Guided Project Based Learning (G-PJBL) Inte-grated Contextual Teaching and Learning (I-CTL) Models to Im-prove Science Process Skills and Strengthen Characters of High School Students/SMA

  • Mulyanti Doctoral Program of Education Science, Postgraduate - Universitas Negeri Padang (UNP)
Keywords: PBL I-CTL Model, Science, Students, High School Students

Abstract

This research is motivated by the low student learning outcomes due to the low understanding of chemical concepts and the lack of student interest in learning. In studying chemistry, students are faced with three worlds, namely the real world (macroscopic), the atomic world (submicroscopic), and the world of symbols. This study aims to produce a G-PJBL I-CTL model to improve the science process skills of SMA that are valid, practical, and effective. This research is research and development or what is known as research and development and is usually abbreviated as R&D. The development of the G-PJBL I-CTL model in chemistry learning in high school follows the steps of the Plomp development model which consists of three developments. the steps, namely: preliminary research, the development or prototyping phase, and the appraisal phase. The results showed that the G-PJBL I-CTL model was valid, practical, and effectively used in high school chemistry learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Anitah, S. (2007). Strategi Pembelajaran di SD. Jakarta: Universitas. Terbuka.
2. Aiedah, A. K., & Lee, K. C. (2012). Application of project-based learning in students’ engagement in Malaysian Studies and English Language. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Education (JIRE), 2(1), 37-46.
3. Chittleborough, G. (2014). The development of theoretical frameworks for understanding the learning of chemistry. In Learning with understanding in the chemistry classroom (pp. 25-40). Springer, Dordrecht.
4. Chandra, D., Mariya, S., Nova, S., Edial, H., Rahmi, L., Putri, S., Novio, R., Nofrion., & Putra, A. (2021). Training in Making Interactive Learning Media (Cycle of Hydrology and Layers of the Atmosphere) SMAN 5 Pariaman and SMAN 1 Ulakan Tapakis, Padang Pariaman. Sumatra Journal of Disaster, Geography and Geography Education, 5(2), 126-130.
5. Colley, K. (2008). Project-based science instruction: A primer. The Science Teacher, 75(8), 23.
6. Dahar, R. W. (2011). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran.Jakarta : Penerbit. Erlangga.
7. Devi, N. (2010).Nutrition and Food.Kompas. Jakarta. Departemen Kesehatan RI.
8. Hermon, D., Erianjoni, E., & Putra, A. (2021). Dissemination of Disaster Preparedness Schools (SSB) in Pariaman City. Science and Environmental Journal for Postgraduate, 4(1), 8-16.
9. Hodgin. (2010). Project-Based Learning: What is it?
http://www.yesnet.yk.ca/schools/wes/what_is_PJBL.html.diakses 21 Maret 2018.
10. Ibrahim & Nur.(2005). Pengajaran Berdasarkan Masalah. Surabaya: University Press.
11. Johnson, E. B. (2009). Contextual Teaching and Learning: Menjadikan Kegiatan Belajar-mengajar Mengasyikkan dan Bermakna. Terj. Ibnu Setiawan. Bandung: Mizan Learning Center.
12. Komisia, F. (2012).Pengaruh Penerapan Pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) dengan Metode Eksperimen dan Demonstrasi dalam Pembelajaran Kimia pada Pokok Bahasan Sistem Koloid terhadap Minat Berwirausaha dan Hasil Belajar Siswa di SMA.Tesis. Medan: Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Medan.
13. Poppy, R. Y. (2010).E-Learning dan Alternatif Pembelajaran.Kontemporer. Bandung: Arfino Raya.
14. Risch B. (ed). (2010). Teaching chemistry around the world, Munster: Waxmann.
15. Sanjaya, W. (2010).Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group,78-266.
16. Suasti, Y., Barlian, E., Muchtar, B., Syah, N., & Putra, A. (2018). Insert Religious Model in the Construction Character of Care for the Environment to the Study of Geography in Padang City–Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Studies and Culture, 6(1), 67-70.
17. Sun, L. K. & Fah, L. Y. (2013).Perbandingan Pola Pembelajaran Kontekstual dan Tahap Pemahaman Sains Pelajar Sekolah Menengah Rendah di Malaysia dan Singapura. Jurnal Teknologi (Social Science), 63 (2), 91-96.
18. Sunyono, D. (2012). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT Buku.
19. Silberberg, S. M. (2010). Principles of General Chemistry, 2nd. Edition, McGraw-Hill Companies
20. Talanquer, V. (2011). Macro, submicron, and symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry “triplet”. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 179-195.
21. Tawil, M & Lilisari (2014). Keterampilan-Keterampilan Sains dan Implementasinya dalam Pembelajaran IPA. Makasar: Badan Penerbit UNM
22. Zumdahl, S. S & Zumdahl, S. L. (2010).Chemistry (eighth edition). United States of America: Cengage Learning
Published
2022-03-25
How to Cite
Mulyanti. (2022). Development of Guided Project Based Learning (G-PJBL) Inte-grated Contextual Teaching and Learning (I-CTL) Models to Im-prove Science Process Skills and Strengthen Characters of High School Students/SMA. Central Asian Journal of Theoretical and Applied Science, 3(3), 63-69. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/UY8GA
Section
Articles