Current Status of Bacterial Wilt Disease in Plants

  • Dr. Dilip Kumar Sharma Director, Vardhman Mahaveer Open University (VMOU), Kota, Rajasthan, India
Keywords: bacterial wilt, disease, status, infection, whole plant, beetle, insecticide, bactericide

Abstract

Bacterial wilt is a complex of diseases that occur in plants such as Cucurbitaceae and Solanaceae (tomato, common bean, etc.) and are caused by the pathogens Erwinia tracheiphila, a gram-negative bacterium, or Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens, a gram-positive bacterium. Cucumber and muskmelon plants are most susceptible, but squash, pumpkins, and gourds may also become infected. Erwinia tracheiphila is spread between plants by two species of insect vectors, striped cucumber beetles (Acalymma vittatum) and spotted cucumber beetles (Diabrotica undecimpunctata). The beetles acquire E. tracheiphila by feeding on infected plants, then carry the bacteria in their digestive tracts. The disease may be spread to susceptible plants through feeding wounds, by way of infected mouthparts or frass. The bacteria is capable of overwintering in the gut of its insect vectors. Bacterial wilt is a disease of the vascular tissue. When a plant is infected, E. tracheiphila multiplies within the xylem, eventually causing mechanical blockage of the water transport system. The first sign of infection, which appears about five days after acquisition, is the wilting of individual leaves on a single stem. However, the disease will soon spread down the runner and then infect the whole plant, causing it to shrivel and die. There is a diagnostic test for bacterial wilt that can be done in the field. The presence of the E. tracheiphila causes the sap to become a milky color and acquire a sticky consistency. If the stem is cut near the crown and the ends are slowly pulled apart, the sap should form a viscous string. Once a plant is infected, there is no way of stopping the spread of the disease. Some cucurbit cultivars are less susceptible than others, so it is beneficial to plant these cultivars. However, since wilt-resistant plants have not yet been developed, the most effective way to prevent the disease is to keep beetle populations at a minimum. While various methods of beetle control have been tested, the most effective preventative measure is to keep beetle populations as low as possible through careful field monitoring and insecticide sprays. Cultural control can also be effective, thus this means one should apply the direct methods.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. CABI/EPPO. 1999. Distribution maps of plant diseases. Map N0. 785 CAB International. Wallingford, U.K.
2. Boshou, L. 2005. A broad review and perspective on breeding for resistance to bacterial wilt, p. 225-238. In C. Allen, P. Prior, and A. C. Hayward (ed.), Bacterial Wilt Disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum Species Complex. APS Press, St. Paul, MN.
3. Coutinho, T. A. 2005. Introduction and prospectus on the survival of R. solanacearum. Pages 29-38 in: Bacterial wilt disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. Allen, C., Prior, P., and Hayward, A. C., eds. APS press, St. Paul, M. N.
4. Denny, T. P. 2006. Plant pathogenic Ralstonia species. Pages 573-644 in: Plant-associated bacteria. S. S. Gnanamanickam, ed. Springer Publishing, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
5. Elphinstone, J. G. 2005. The current bacterial wilt situation: a global overview. Pages 9-28 in: Bacterial wilt disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. C. Allen, P. Prior, and A. C. Hayward, eds. APS press, St-Paul, M. N.
6. Fegan M. and Prior P. 2005. How complex is the "Ralstonia solanacearum" complex ? Pages 449-461 in: Bacterial wilt disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. C., Allen, P., Prior, A. C., Hayward, eds. APS Press, St. Paul, M. N.
7. Gitaitis, R., McCarter, S., and Jones, J. 1992. Disease control in tomato transplants produced in Georgia and Florida. Plant Disease 76:651-656.
8. Ji, P., M. T. Momol, S. M. Olson, and P. M. Pradhanang. 2005. Evaluation of thymol as biofumigant for control of bacterial wilt of tomato under field conditions. Plant Disease 89:497-500.
9. Kucharek, T. 1998. Bacterial wilt of row crops in Florida. 9 p. University of Florida, Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Florida, U. S. Cir. 1207.
10. Lambert, C. D. 2002. Agricultural bioterrorism protection act of 2002: possession, use, and transfer of biological; agents and toxins; interim and final rule. (7 CFR Part 331). Federal Register 67:76908-76938.
11. Pradhanang, P.M., Ji, P., Momol, M.T., Olson, S.M., Mayfield, J.L., and Jones, J.B. 2005. Application of acibenzolar-S-methyl enhances host resistance in tomato against Ralstonia solanacearum. Plant Disease 89:989-993.
12. McCarter, S. M. 1991. Bacterial wilt. Pages 28-29 in: Compendium of tomato diseases. Jones, J. B., Jones, J. P., Stall, R. E., and Zitter, T. A., eds. APS Press Publisher: St. Paul, M. N.
13. Saddler, G. S. 2005. Management of bacterial wilt disease. Pages 121-132 in: Bacterial wilt disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. Allen, C., Prior, P., and Hayward, A. C., eds. APS press, St. Paul, M. N.
14. Compendium of Potato Diseases (2001) ed. by Stevenson, W.R. and et al, American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN, USA.
15. Mulder, A. and Trukensteen, L. J. (2005) Potato diseases, 2508 AC Den Haag The Netherlands.
16. Potato Health management (2008) ed. by Johnson, D.A. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Published
2022-09-12
How to Cite
Sharma, D. D. K. (2022). Current Status of Bacterial Wilt Disease in Plants. Central Asian Journal of Theoretical and Applied Science, 3(9), 16-24. Retrieved from https://cajotas.centralasianstudies.org/index.php/CAJOTAS/article/view/912