Ecological Theory: Anthropocentrism as an Evolving Phenomenon in the Global Environment

  • Wagianto Master Program of Environmental Sciences, Universitas Negeri Padang (UNP) – Indonesia
  • Dadan M Hamdani Master Program of Environmental Sciences, Universitas Negeri Padang (UNP) – Indonesia
  • Ebill Fuji Edison Master Program of Environmental Sciences, Universitas Negeri Padang (UNP) – Indonesia
  • Stefano Adam Master Program of Environmental Sciences, Universitas Negeri Padang (UNP) – Indonesia
  • Iswandi Umar Master Program of Environmental Sciences, Universitas Negeri Padang (UNP) – Indonesia
  • Eri Barlian Master Program of Environmental Sciences, Universitas Negeri Padang (UNP) – Indonesia
Keywords: Anthropocentrism, Natural Resources, Environmental Damage, Evolving Phenomenon

Abstract

Man, as a creature of God's creation is given an advantage over other creatures, nevertheless the advantages are used by humans inappropriately. Anthropocentrism's ecological theory places man as the central or most important entity in the universe and has full authority to manage God-given natural resources. Initially, humans were present in the world collaborating, fused with the environment, and utilizing natural resources just to meet the needs of life in the form of food, taking directly from nature and relying on simple technology. As the population grows and the desire to socialize, settle in a certain area, leading humans to be creative with their minds, start farming and raising simply. Excessive exploitation of natural resources by humans begins when population growth begins to get out of control and the availability of natural resources is not proportional to population growth. The impact of excessive exploitation of natural resources, characterized by uncontrolled environmental damage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Abdillah, M. (2005). Environmental Jurisprudence; Spiritual Guide to Living with Environmental Perspective, Yogyakarta: UPP AMP YKPN.
2. Barlian, E., & Iswandi, U. (2020). Human Ecology. Yogyakarta. Depublish
3. Boslaugh SE (2013). Anthropocentrism. EncyclopediaBritannica. Archived from the original on 05 December 2021.
4. Hill, T. E. (1983). Ideals of human excellence and preserving natural environments. Environmental Ethics, 5(3), 211-224.
5. Kuntowijoyo. (1998). Islamic Paradigm Interpretation for Action, Bandung: Mizan.
6. Moritz, J. M. (2012). Human uniqueness, the other Hominids, and “anthropocentrism of the gaps” in the religion and science dialogue. Zygon®, 47(1), 65-96.
7. Moore, BL (2017). Ecological literature and the critique of anthropocentrism. Springer.
8. Norton, BG (2017). Environmental ethics and weak anthropocentrism. In The Ethics of the Environment (pp. 333-350). Routledge.
9. Shihab, M Quraish. (2013). Grounding the Quran. Bandung: Mizan,
10. Yusuf, H. (2013). Cultural Philosophy; Strategy for Cultural Development Based on Local Wisdom, Bandar Lampung: Harakindo Publishing
Published
2021-12-18
How to Cite
Wagianto, Hamdani, D. M., Edison, E. F., Adam, S., Umar, I., & Barlian, E. (2021). Ecological Theory: Anthropocentrism as an Evolving Phenomenon in the Global Environment. Central Asian Journal of Theoretical and Applied Science, 2(12), 278-282. Retrieved from https://cajotas.centralasianstudies.org/index.php/CAJOTAS/article/view/345

Most read articles by the same author(s)